CO129-607-3 Revenue Reward Fund 11-11-1948 - 12-12-1948 — Page 6

On the pension point, I agree that explanation giving in para 4 of

the ex

enclosure II to No 5 is reasonable.

In

there is no

G

any case, the fact remains that provision for addition to on abolition of office,

pension

and the

petitioners cannot, therefore,

cannot, therefore, be eligible

for such an addition.

The

reasts

10.48

mly doubtful print is whether para. 194 of the Hay Kay flaries Commission Report, 1947

(com α-6)-

رك

bad the

nother untidily worded recommendation

fum acceptet of the

in which ham

Grunge and

the S.

J S.

entities

servant still in

the??h Jon, equef,

Jon, cquet, the

evey Hong Kong for. same.

service

benefits 1 the toleries revision.

oo is windly guite way in equity

that the petitioner

who

neve fel

sel fort

in Hong Kong during the pairs of which

returspection benefits relate _1! Jan, 194),

ti! Jon, 184f

shred stain theme

benefiti

and I hope

wr

com support

the fremor.

3711